Kenya’s government has intensified its plea for an end to weeks of protests that have rocked the nation. On Thursday, police attempted to ban demonstrations in Nairobi, citing infiltration by criminal gangs. However, this ban was swiftly overturned by the High Court, pending a full hearing on the matter.
Government’s Appeal and Court Intervention
Protests across Kenya have led to at least 50 deaths over the past month. Demonstrators, driven by youth-led movements, have voiced their discontent over proposed tax hikes and broader issues of corruption and poor governance. Despite President William Ruto withdrawing the contentious tax legislation and dismissing almost all of his cabinet, protests have continued unabated.
Police justified the ban on protests by arguing that criminal elements were exploiting the unrest to engage in looting and violence. However, the High Court suspended this ban, allowing demonstrations to proceed while the case is heard.
Activists have urged people to gather with camping gear to occupy Uhuru Park, a significant site near Nairobi’s city center. This call to action has been met with a heavy police presence throughout the city, reflecting the tense atmosphere.
Economic Impact and Government Response
The government claims the protests have caused significant economic damage, estimating losses at approximately 6 billion Kenyan shillings ($46 million). Government spokesperson Isaac Mwaura emphasized that the administration has heard the protesters’ grievances and is ready to address their concerns. However, this has not quelled the unrest.
The protests, which have largely been organized online without direct involvement from opposition political figures, have become the biggest challenge to President Ruto’s administration since he took office two years ago. The demonstrators demand Ruto’s resignation and call for substantial reforms to tackle corruption and improve governance.
Ruto’s proposal to form a broad-based government was rejected by the opposition coalition, which instead called for a constitutional convention. This rejection has added another layer of complexity to the situation, as Ruto’s office has yet to initiate the proposed multi-sectoral talks aimed at addressing the protesters’ demands.
The rallies initially began peacefully but have frequently turned violent. Instances of clashes between police and demonstrators, including a brief occupation of the parliament building on June 25, have escalated the situation. The police’s use of live ammunition has further inflamed tensions.
Prominent activists have criticized the government’s response to the protests. Boniface Mwangi, a well-known activist, stated on social media that neither the police nor President Ruto have the authority to suspend constitutionally guaranteed rights, including the right to protest.
Meanwhile, the Communications Authority of Kenya has issued warnings to media outlets about their coverage of the protests. The regulator accused some broadcasters of compromising objectivity and balance, potentially exacerbating the unrest. This warning highlights the delicate balance the media must maintain in reporting on such volatile situations.
Source: ReutersÂ
